|
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or
draw pictures in the reader's mind, and the choice and placement of the
words seems accurate, natural and not forced. |
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or
draw pictures in the reader's mind, but occasionally the words are used
inaccurately or seem overdone. |
Writer uses words that communicate clearly, but the
writing lacks variety, punch or flair. |
Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not
communicate strongly or capture the reader's interest. Jargon or cliches
may be present and detract from the meaning. |
|
|
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic
and previews the structure of the paper. |
The introduction clearly states the main topic and
previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to
the reader. |
The introduction states the main topic, but does not
adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly
inviting to the reader. |
There is no clear introduction of the main topic or
structure of the paper. |
|
|
The writer seems to be writing from knowledge or
experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."
|
The writer seems to be drawing on knowledge or
experience, but there is some lack of ownership of the topic. |
The writer relates some of his own knowledge or
experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic. |
The writer has not tried to transform the information
in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong
to someone else. |
|
|
The reader's questions are anticipated and answered
thoroughly and completely. |
The reader's questions are anticipated and answered to
some extent. |
The reader is left with one or two questions. More
information is needed to "fill in the blanks". |
The reader is left with several questions.
|